RCG believes that if you condemn anyone based on color or ethnicity or ancestry as inferior or immoral then you yourself are guilty of racism.

If you doubt that morality is objective, then you are in the unenviable position of having to justify slavery and genocide. The dilemma can be phrased as such:

If there is no Objective Morality, why was Hitler wrong? If there is an Objective Morality, why do you get to decide what it is and not Hitler?

Worse you cannot decry slavery as evil without an objective moral standard. If morality is determined by the masses, or culture or power then one cannot condemn slavery. Why? Because a majority of the world thought slavery was OK as long as they were not the slaves. Every culture had legal slavery except for the Israelites (enslavement of a human was punishable by death and they only had indentured labor to pay off debts).

Morality is objective and not based on personal experience, culture or color.

To be a racist, one must purposely disparage other cultures or individuals independently of the morality of their actions or call their actions immoral not based on an objective moral law but based on the color of their skin or simply because they are different from your culture. Ignorantly or unintentionally disparaging other cultures (for non-immoral actions) becomes racist when these individuals are told about their racism and rather than correct their behavior double down on it.

Social Justice is a convenient fiction created to manipulate the masses. All social justice principles if they are not Moral Justice issues tend toward merely the forced equalization of results independent of effort. This makes most “Social Justice” actions actually “Moral Injustices.”

Moral Justice issues can be evaluated with only one question: Are Inalienable Rights being violated. A Right is anything granted by the Creator of all Mankind, and is never the result of someone’s labor.